Title

Finitude, Fallenness, and Immediacy Husserlian Replies to Westphal and Smith

School/Department

Talbot School of Theology

Publication Date

2011

Abstract

Merold Westphal and James K. A. Smith argue forcefully that Christians should embrace the postmodern turn to interpretation. They draw upon Derrida and Heidegger, and they criticize Edmund Husserl’s “metaphysics of presence” and our ability to know reality directly. They reject his epistemology as modern and arrogant, as an attempt to gain pristine knowledge. But I argue that they radically misunderstand and therefore wrongly reject Husserl. This will allow me to show why their view, that “everything is interpretation,” is mistaken. It also will allow me to show why Husserl’s earlier work shows us how we can know reality immediately.

Keywords

Postmodernism; Husserl; Epistemology

Publication Title

Philosophia Christi

Volume

13

Issue

1

First Page

105

Last Page

126

DOI of Published Version

10.5840/pc20111317

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS