Swift and simple refutation of the Kalam cosmological argument?
Talbot School of Theology
John Taylor complains that the Kalam cosmological argument gives the appearance of being a swift and simple demonstration of the existence of a Creator of the universe hereas in fact a convincing argument involving the premiss that the universe began to exist is very difficult to achieve. But Taylor's proffered defeaters of the premisses of the philosophical arguments for the beginning of the universe are themselves typically undercut due to Taylor's inadvertence to alternatives open to the defender of the Kalam arguments. With respect to empirical confirmation of the universe's beginning Taylor is forced into an anti-realist position on the Big Bang theory, but without sufficient warrant for singling out the theory as non-realistic. Therefore, despite the virtue of simplicity of form, the Kalam cosmological argument has not been defeated by Taylor's all too swift refutation.
DOI of Published Version
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Craig, William Lane, "Swift and simple refutation of the Kalam cosmological argument?" (1999). Faculty Articles & Research. 661.