Title
Knowledge Argument Revisited
School/Department
Talbot School of Theology
Publication Date
6-2003
Abstract
The literature on the Knowledge Argument exhibits considerable confusion about the precise nature of the argument. I contend that a clarification of the essence of self-presenting properties provides an explanation of this confusion such that the confusion itself is evidence for dualism. I also claim that Mary gains six different sorts of knowledge after gaining sight, and I show how this claim provides a response to a physicalist undercutting defeater for the Knowledge Argument. I try to show that this defeater is inadequate due to its failure to capture the epistemic richness of what happens to Mary. Finally, I indicate how my enriched version of the Knowledge Argument provides grounds for rejecting those varieties of physicalism that eschew a depiction of phenomenal properties as intrinsic attributes a subject exemplifies in favor of a view that treats them as functional roles a subject realizes.
Keywords
Knowledge argument;
Publication Title
International philosophical quarterly: IPQ
Volume
43
Issue
2
First Page
219
Last Page
228
DOI of Published Version
10.5840/ipq20034324
Recommended Citation
Moreland, James Porter, "Knowledge Argument Revisited" (2003). Faculty Articles & Research. 620.
https://digitalcommons.biola.edu/faculty-articles/620